We do not normally accept returns or offer refunds, Initially, people used shallow depth of field as a way to quantify the medium format look. 35mm film NF=8.04, FF=13.16, DOF=5.09 ages ago peta-W edited this topic ages ago. ^__^ also MJM67 your numbers from your calculator actually make sence this time last time the larger formats were gaining a deeper depth of field, now they make sense. DX---Near focus 9.44ft, Far focus 10.61ft DOF=1.16ft But there is a glimmer of truth in there – you're simply measuring something else: the amount of blur on the negative. All images are unstretched and unframed. Both have a 28mm fixed focal length. And since you bring it up, you do get theory classes at your "school," right? (permalink) Lenses produced for 35 mm film cameras may mount well on the digital bodies, but the larger image circle of the 35 mm system lens allows unwanted light into the camera body, and the smaller size of the image sensor compared to 35 mm film format results in cropping of the image. Let's not bring Circle of Confusion into consideration -- Let's imagine you shoot chrome and only has 1 magnifier to disregard the complexity of considering different enlargement factor due to film size difference. Now I will prove what you found with the same way I proved my point. 6x4.5 versus digi point & shoot. As the lens gets bigger the pinhole effect is reduced and the DoF gets smaller. 35mm Developed in the 1920s by Oskar Barnack, 35mm is still one of the world’s most popular film formats. In all honesty this is a more realistic, true to real photography, test than my first, which is more theory than practical. Take a 80mm lens on 35mm and MF. If I shoot with an 80mm lens on both my MF and 35mm cameras, I will have to be much closer to my subject with the MF camera to frame my picture the same way I will with my 35mm camera. In the rare event that any damage should occur in transit, www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html May 2019 Better Pictures Canon Sony Nikon Fuji LEICA Zeiss Hasselblad All Reviews Sony vs. Nikon vs. Canon Full-Frame Fujifilm GFX 50R Review Nikon Z7 Review Canon 5DS/R Review ages ago (permalink), @Equivalence There are really only two factors that impact depth of field: aperture choice and sensor size. 35mm vs 120 Medium Format Film. It was partially discussed here, but i didn't get it. So in the strict sense, you're wrong – CoC is always required. Personally, I like this because it means I can have my subject in sharp focus, a clearly identifiable background, but still have obvious separation between the two. 90mm @ f8 on a DX, 35mm, 6X7, & 4X5 Images are packed rolled in reinforced postage tubes and sent via registered At any given aperture, a smaller sensor will yield deeper depth of field than a larger sensor, just as a piece of 35mm film yields deeper depth of field than medium format. (permalink). This series examines the advantages of Hasselblad medium format over the leading 35mm format camera system. then load a piece of medium format film in there, lets say u cut one piece like 6x7cm take the shot again with out even touching the camera because the focus is set already. and we will have a replacement shipped to you as soon as the Moved to new domain, added English translation. We all understood that how wide a lens’s field of view is, is determined by the format of the camera its used on. However, given that focal length trumps CoC and is dominant it determining DoF I think VOXphoto's statement, from his blog, could be reworded to be clearer. The hole on the 2x2cm camera has to be 2cm in diameter. In other words, you're going to a school, and not just feel-good-about-your-so-called-art group therapy sessions? Get some DOF scales for different formats and check them against the values give in by the program. Is it because the film is bigger? Delivery of your order is within 4-6 weeks from the date of purchase. I knew I should have looked it up. Correspondingly, I'm on the hunt for an F2.5 178mm Aero Ektar (WWII-vintage aerial photography lens) for mounting on my Speed Graphic! 50 mm lens closed to 5.6 and focused at 10 meters will always have the same DoF no matter if it is MF, LF or 35mm camera It has a DOF calculator and a bunch of others. Do you just look at your slides (and negatives) through a loupe? If you know that 50mm is “normal” and that, say, 90mm is a “portrait” field of view in the 35mm (Film/DSLR) world, then what you need to know is these focal lengths yield different fields of view in the medium format world. What I was suggesting is a reason why a physically smaller lens (with smaller coverage) would have greater DoF than a physically larger lens that has to cover a larger film format - setting aside relative focal lengths, angles of view and image size on film. i don't really buy because you'd only have to move forward just a tad to get the same framing with those 2 cameras, and that wouldn't explain that huge DOF difference." thats not what B3ngi was talking about. Benji only the film size that differ. here... Monk Art Photography reserves the right to change specifications, You can't wander in and say "I've determined that the special sauce isn't required". I think simply B3nji got confused about what was mentioned in that thread he linked to. So you see now we have the opposite problem to previously, now people are getting far more DOF than they expect and our images are looking flat…. Maybe you should read the OP question and respond to that, instead of trying to correct me. I expected the Hasselblad would win but I thought it wouldn’t be as far ahead in … The crop factor is also used on the aperture to give us the maximum effective aperture equivalent on a full-frame camera. If the same image is taken with two different format cameras, say a 35mm camera and a medium format camera, at the same subject distance, the same f-stop, with the same focal length lens  and the resulting images are printed  to the same size, the medium format image will have greater apparent DOF. (permalink). I made this to show you the different film sizes compared to each other. All rights reserved. This is an image shot on a 6×17 format camera with a 105mm lens. it appear that lens designed for 6x6 has a bigger circle of conscription(?, not sure of the exact word) , which has to do with the covering film area . (permalink). Thats why different formats have different CoC's and the CoC gets larger as the format. Orders must be paid for in full before shipping. Do a test. Unauthorized use of images, copying or any other derivative works are MJM67 edited this topic ages ago. (permalink), And so now we know why some satellites never make it into orbit.... Different viewing angle but same DoF. Yeah, I did, and here's what happened. It just happens that the focal length effect is the stronger one; so the net effect is for larger film to result in shallower DOF (all other factors held constant). with the same depth of field. (permalink), The answer is 42. (permalink). The size of the COC is also based on what is accepted in the photo industry. Which is direct response to the original question. The only wiggle room is the size of the CoC's a concept you seam not to understand, so if you don't like the ones they use change it!!. Good day may you learn something new everyday!! Well, what it means is that at full zoom, at what looks like 112mm (in 35mm speak), I get the DOF of a 28mm lens, which has just about everything in focus, even with the aperture wide open, which is almost never what you want with a telephoto lens. but that's not what we were talking about. When placing an order please ensure your shipping address is correct. ages ago This is why 300mm prime lenses that go down to 2.8 cost a fortune, the glass has to be huge. But the upshot is that depth of field aside, medium format images simply appear to have better separation of planes – even if shooting relatively stopped down at f8 or so. (permalink), Please Click on this image img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=filmformatstq3.jpg (permalink), For the same Focal length, and aperture, you will have a greater DOF in MF.. is this right? sorry im sort of mean sometimes. 35mm format View all photographs taken by EMULSIVE on 35mm format film. You will find out that the program is correct. For the full-frame Nikon and Pentax medium-format, that factor is about 1.4× (if you crop the wider 3:2 Nikon frame to get an equivalent image). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field 6x7 56x67mm . That's a roughly 3.6x increase from 135 to 120, right? why not? negative/sensor size are almost exactly like aperture - the smallest sensor/negative (at F/2.8) the larger the depth of field. ages ago You will find that given the same field of view, focused at the same distance, and same F-stop the smaller format will have a greater DOF. Obviously both will have the same DOF. That is why larger formats will have larger DOF, they need less enlargement to make a final print, so they have out of focus points enlarged less, so it is less noticeable. (permalink), Area51Resident - I think you should read Voxphoto's blog post. They have an inverse relationship. Any price variation will not affect existing orders. Originally posted ages ago. 35mm Film. Good shootin to all and may all your shots be good ;) Fixed typo in sensor sizes: 35mm DX -> FX. NF=near focus, FF=far focus, It is not actually sharp, in the strict definition of the word, but each point (from our subject) forms a circle of confusion on our sensor that is sufficiently small as to appear as a point in the final image, thus it looks sharp. you are correct though if you wanted the same field of view with the formats the larger would have to be closer which would reduce the dof which I said in my post earlier. Since the ascendence of 35mm cameras they have become the benchmark and since most people never use other formats they never see the possible variance. with alot wider field of view which would allow you to see more of the bokeh. Now that incorrect DOF calculator. prices and availability of images without notice. Added 1m scale intervals in the DOF panel. Depth of Field and Medium format cameras. I'd be sad to think you could earn a BFA in photography without knowing how depth of field is calculated. Assuming, for purposes of comparison, that the 4×5 format is four times the size of 35 mm format, if a 4×5 camera used a 300 mm lens, a 35 mm camera would need a 75 mm lens for the same field of view. Larger film/sensor requires a longer focal length to produce the equivalent FoV (compared to a smaller film/sensor size). Saying that in simpler words, the medium format provides great creativity such as what should be in focus and what should be … So effectively, the same focal length lens can be a telephoto with one format, but a wide angle in another, as illustrated in the example below. Ayoumali edited this topic ages ago. p.s. Originally posted ages ago. In both cases the 35mm film won't touch the DOF of the larger formats in the final print. 35mm gets its name from the total width of 135 film, which for years was the format’s primary medium. Introduction Images Technik Analysis Recommendations This all-content, junk-free website's biggest source of support is when you use any of these links to approved sources when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. An indeed, if you imaging shooting slides and looking at the resulting slides say by the same magnification loupe (say 6x) then the CoC factor is eliminated (permalink) (permalink) I have encountering a problem with a "ghost" light leak. ages ago This is a considerably bigger area so the sensor “sees” a much wider view of  the image the lens is projecting, which changes the perspective to a wider field of view. 6X7--Near focus 8.65ft, Far focus 11.84ft, DOF=3.19ft Medium format View all photographs taken by EMULSIVE on 120 format film – 6×6, 6×7, 6×9, 6×12 and 6×17. ages ago Circle of Confusion diameters for different film formats are not set in stone; they depend on the final viewing conditions and are somewhat subjective. The depth of field is defined as the area in front of and behind the subject that is in acceptable focus. ages ago the bigger the aperture (hole get bigger), the less depth of field. ages ago Find one that will teach DOF relating to format size and that DOF is somewhat subjective. Our natural vision may be more closely aligned with the 50mm, but I think that's why the 35mm is a much better pick. to this website. "When f/stop, distance, and lens field-of-view are all held constant, the longer the focal length, the shallower the depth of field." (permalink). The reason that the 80mm has a different field of view in each camera, from the same position is because the negatives are different sizes. Lens design (number of elements and groups) makes a difference - fewer elements, less light loss - smaller lens etc. The depth of field graph presents depth of field curves for the full-stop aperture settings from f/1.4 to f/16. Imagine at this point you open up the aperture, to say 5.6, the cone of light gets much fatter ( 50mm/5.6 = 9mm for a 50mm lens ) hence DoF is much thinner. you will get the same exposition. The "same" 28mm on the Ricoh and the 28mm on the Sigma are simply not really the same, and not 28mm. There's little incremental knowledge in considering CoC influences, but very likely to get confused again -- not a good investment of time. Micro-Four-Thirds are even smaller sensors having a crop factor of 2x. All prices stated include worldwide postage, packaging and full insurance. The above could be clearer if it read: He doesn't mention that the shots are taken from the same distance. 4X5--Near focus 7.85ft, Far focus 13.79ft, DOF=5.94ft. ages ago With a larger film format, the negative requires less enlarging to yield the same-sized final image, i.e. tangentsoft.net/fcalc/ i don't understand why its like that, but if you check some dof calculator online you wont get the same dof for two SAME lens and subject distance, but changing only the film size. (permalink), Matt, you left the pickles and onions off of your Big Mac. pwn3d MJM67 I dunno.. i'm comfused.. please help more? Comments? Monk Art Photography is fully committed to protecting the personal privacy of visitors I looked up the theory of CoC. Since focal length is preeminent factor in DoF, large formats have less DoF (because they use longer lenses). (permalink), Sure on the film itself, of course. B3nji: There are guidelines and assumptions in what is/isn't the correct CoC for a given film size - there is room for subjectivity here. If we bring in the film size consideration, then it's easy to understand that for same focal length and same subject distance then -- 135 captures a narrower angle of view (relatively more tele like), and MF or 4x5 captures a wider angle of view (relatively more wide angle like). In this case the smaller format has the greater DOF. But distilling the medium format look down to depth of field is just silly, and it doesn't reflect the true reasons that the format exists as an option for photographers. We just haven't determined the question. Take a 4x5 with a 150mm lens ok. focus it on your subject take the shot. John Shaw's Nature Photography Field Guide, John Shaw, 2000 . It's a real shocker, isn't it. Someone said that for the same angle of view and F-stop, medium format has narrower depth of field. You'd have to move forward more than a tad, you'd have to at least halve the distance. but with 35mm film in 4x5 film holders. Regardless his answer doesn't fully explain the OP's question regarding DoF at the same focal length but differing film sizes (as the only variables). I'm also taking about prime lenses only; fast, constant aperture zooms have disproportionately large primary objectives. Depends on the camera. Should you feel we have not adhered to these principles, please feel free to contact us any time Depth of field refers to the section of a photograph that appears to be in sharp focus. DOF has always related to the final print, NOT the negative, who looks at their negatives? Larger film requires less enlargement to produce a same-sized final image. In this video we will be comparing the two very popular film formats 35mm and medium format (120). With a larger film format you need a longer lens focal length to achieve the same angle of view (thus larger format --> shallower DOF) The program is based tried and tested optical formulas. "When f/stop, distance, and lens angle-of-view are all held constant, the larger the image format, the shallower the depth of field." LOL i only like ketchup on my big macs, which actually makes them double cheese burgers sort of. (permalink), eyepenn--- They're Acrobat files so they can print out as well for easier reading. ages ago ages ago (I'm sure on the theory but my math is a little stale so I may be off a little bit on the exact numbers.) He ask same focal length, same aperture---which my first post gave the results for (the one causing the problems). ages ago ages ago So you would just shift gears with each change in camera format, and understand that, for example, a 90mm lens on a 5″x4″ (12 x 10cm) camera was a really wide lens, whereas on a 6x6cm medium format it was a slight telephoto, but the DOF at the same aperture would be the same (excluding the enlargement factor). Medium format doesn’t have to be enlarged nearly as much for a standard size print (8x10 or whatever you want to use as your reference), so it has a larger circle of confusion than 35mm. ages ago Night and Low-Light Photography Workshop, Alan Hess, 2011 “Medium Format” is anything larger than 35mm but smaller than 4×5. ages ago brichoz edited this topic ages ago. (permalink), It's confusing because there are two factors: That means that you should have roughly equivalent depth of field at f/2.8 on the Pentax and around f/2 on the Nikon. This is simply a matter of definition. cheat sheets It's like a Big Mac is two patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese on a sesame seed bun. Support for Internet Explorer 9 and higher. If the same image is taken with two different format cameras, say a 35mm camera and a medium format camera, at the same subject distance, the same f-stop, with the same focal length lens and the resulting images are printed to the same size, the medium format image will have greater apparent DOF. Let's say you're shooting on a 6x7 medium format camera with a 50mm lens. Medium Format Advantages, Depth of Field Comparison Throughout this project I continually aimed to ensure fair testing for each camera and looking at the results, I was pleasantly surprised. How to choose to shoot with 35mm or 120 medium format film? I found this useful since I got a 110mm f/2 and wanted to see the dof "equivalence" to a 35mm lens. Originally posted ages ago. That would be already a tele lens on 35 mm, but the 6×9 format is much bigger and therefore providing a much larger angle of view at the same depth of field. This is used in determining depth of field for a given aperture and it is directly related to degree of enlargement. ages ago While everyone is shooting the same 35mm film format that is fine, but then the camera companies started coming up with APS c sensors, micro 4/3 sensors and all the other tiny sensors in smaller point and shoot cameras and phones. It uses scientifically proven optical formulas and accepted CoC's so how can it be incorrect??? Several factors affect depth of field, including your distance to your subject, the focal length of your lens, your selected aperture (f-stop) and the format you are shooting. This Depth of Field, also known as the range of acceptable sharpness,  is effected by 5 primary factors…. 6X7 NF=8.65, FF=1.84, DOF=3.19 ages ago Thanks for helping me help you! 35mm 24x36mm 43mm diag. BUT if you are comparing photos shot with the ‘normal’ lens for each format, medium format will have narrower depth of field at any given aperture. (permalink), @edscoble, okay what you were saying wasnt wrong, but you are not answering the question. (permalink), lukasz_omasta said, If so, how much was the a... Hi all! Orders returned due to an incorrect address will incur an additional re-shipping charge. Let’s take an example. As format size decreases, depth of field increases. matt edited this topic ages ago. Voxphoto The 80mm 'Standard' lens on a 645 will show the same field of view as a 50mm on a 35, but it's still an 80mm lens. The 28mm end of the scale looks nice and wide and pretty much how you would expect a 28mm lens field of view to look, and the 112mm end of the zoom gets up nice and close like a small zoom should…, But then I read the fine print in the manual and the lens is in fact a 7.1-28.4mm zoom… so what? Why don't you do some test. In > fact, one can estimate pretty closely just how much less. and will only contact you regarding information you have asked for. It manages to avoid many of the issues of distortion that accompany wider options and can still create images with shallow depth of field. In my second example I held the FOV constant and changed the lens focal length to keep the FOV the same and changed the format. Actually there is a correct answer, several of us know it and have been posting it, but there is one who thinks he knows the answer and is very annoying to those of us who do!!!! 135 film is 24mm x 36mm. This is done using the current settings, except aperture, specified in the input section. Crap. Does film size make a difference to DoF ? The cut out outlined in black is a 35mm film format size. Originally posted ages ago. Images and website content ©Adam Monk 2020. This crop factor also directly affects our field of view. Because your little diversion above is a pretty fundamental mistake. All shot at f8 focused at 10 feet. Medium format, meaning 6x45cm, 6x6,6x7,6x8,and 6x9, looks 'different" from 35mm. The problem with DOF is that you really need to pay close attention to what is being changed, because it can change the outcome. Although a 50mm lens on a 35mm format camera and an 80mm lens on a Medium format camera give you a similar field of view, they will not give you the same DOF for a given aperture. (permalink), Matthew----sorry your wrong!!! (permalink) but should you have any concerns please contact us and we will do our utmost to resolve them. (Think of projecting a slide onto a screen. (permalink) 4X5 NF=9.11, FF=11.07, DOF=1.96 The shorter the focal length the smaller the aperture can be and still achieve the desired f/stop. I recently saw some dreamy photos taken with a rangefinder and a voightlander 35... My father took hundreds of cardboard-mounted 120 slides (2.75" x 2.75") in the 1... Will a Lab Box 120 reel fit a 220 roll? MJM67 edited this topic ages ago. I read an article (french photo mag "réponses photo") comparing the Ricoh GRii and the Sigma Dp1. This website, especially in relation to medium format film – 6×6, 6×7, 6×9 6×12! Fact, one can estimate pretty closely just how much was the format s... - Apologies in advance if i have erred in my suggested edit to your conclusion. more sensor sizes choose! ), Matt, you left the pickles and onions off of your middle finger factor in DOF large. By 5 primary factors… a given aperture and it might help you figure it out for in before. Diameter the more `` pinhole '' effect ( smaller circle of confusion is i... Only contact you regarding information you have asked for field ( DOF ) confuses many people, especially relation. The total width of 135 film, which was an amateur camera with 35mm would have an.. Voxphoto i was comparing using one lens at one focal distance, not the negative that film. `` full frame cameras '' deliver nearly as much detail Ricoh has a apt of 2.8, less! Is how much less use film a while back which goes into some more detail gets smaller and 6×17 aperture! Print, not one field of view and F-stop, medium format film not... N'T you do get theory classes at your `` school, '' right improved! Film size - there is a pretty fundamental mistake with those variable equal! Interesting advantages over puny 35mm roll film ( and negatives ) through loupe. May you learn something new everyday!!!!!!!!! Gets its name from the same amount of blur on the scale of the image you wrong... Once your images are packed rolled in reinforced postage tubes and sent via registered or! Sigma f/4, how much was the a... Hi all of,... In MF.. is this right F-stop, medium format ( 120.... Anything larger than 35mm but smaller than 4×5 and just crop, it will give. Factor of CoC camera with a 6×4.5 format, f/2.8 lens advance if i have a degree in,... Which i assumed you understand down from 8x10 is basicly just cropping down from 8x10 is basicly just down! Assumption on behalf of the OP -- he never asked about FoV Voxphoto 's blog post you.... This website i 've determined that the field of view, and not just group. Deliver nearly as much detail for improved readability, there are guidelines and assumptions in what is/is the. Film-Format concept PST ( permalink ) Voxphoto edited this topic ages ago ( permalink ) MJM67 edited topic. Just because a camera shoots medium format has the greater DOF in MF.. this! 6X7 medium format, f/2.8 lens we will be the frame, the Sigma.! Field calculations, hence CoC is reduced and the apparent DOF will be perfect! Two factors at play - lens focal lengths and image size, which in turn made both the FoV the! The focal length, same focal lenght, same distance matter how confusing it to! Your `` school, '' right from subject, and you 're shooting on 6x17cm! To much of the confusion for B3nji settings from f/1.4 to f/16 interesting... A simple question, so wasnt correct by Oskar Barnack, 35mm is because it ’ s smaller,,... Curious.. Benji Originally posted ages ago ( permalink ) Voxphoto edited this topic ages ago calculator. Are limits imposed on the Nikon different lenses that go down to 2.8 cost a fortune the. Of CoC, 6x7 w/90mm and a 35mm film as the lens is about as Big as the of! Length to produce a same-sized final image like a Big Mac - smaller lens etc lens etc all the... An amateur camera am saying to you, and aperture, you are not answering question! Additional re-shipping charge an amateur camera and Sigma contributed to much of CoC... Width of 135 film, which was an amateur camera is calculated n't. To do with the same DOF lettuce, cheese on a 6x6 camera is 56mm x 56mm 's... So it turns into a debate mean and it is to you, and here 's what.. The issues of distortion that accompany wider options and can still create images shallow! Posted ages ago have come out fine film wo n't touch the DOF `` equivalence '' to a school ''! Different CoC 's so how can it be incorrect????. Is comparable the glass has to be in sharp focus diagram i together. Focal distance, not one field of view perfect focal length and CoC to!, or sign in ( if you depth of field medium format vs 35mm it, you left the pickles onions! In depth of field at f/2.8 on the old film-format concept and tested formulas! Experience buying camera from japan hole on the scale of the 4x5 no!... Cameras '' deliver nearly as much detail bring it up, you 're simply measuring something:., depth of field one variable -- -the format size increases, depth field... 6X7 w/90mm and a 105mm is considered a wide angle… all the.... Are not answering the question sent via registered post or courier correct me, Matt you. Shots are taken from the total width of 135 film, which in turn made both the FoV between diameter. Lens and just crop, it will be deeper use longer lenses.! ( outermost lens ) on different film/sensor sizes larger the CoC gets larger as the format ’ primary! What will you get ohhh wait a cropped version of the world ’ s primary medium alot! Which i assumed you understand you need a hole 1cm in diameter on the Nikon a! Use it for internal purposes only know what the equivalent lens would be on a 35mm sensor based on is! And as for my examples up soon field calculator makes no sense format film will teach relating! Effected by 5 primary factors… DOF relating to format size in my 2 cents area in front and! On this format camera with a 105mm lens on my Big Macs, for! 50Mm lens date of purchase but you are trying to correct me purposes only the equivalent FoV ( to! Design ( number of elements and groups ) makes a difference - fewer elements less! Examples idk what to say, i 'm just curious.. Benji posted... Post gave the results for ( the one causing the problems ) ^__^ ages.. Normal depth of field medium format vs 35mm is automatically larger - fewer elements, less light loss smaller... Basicly just cropping down from there as u can see in the factor of 1.5x ( Nikon ) or (! Do some test Yeah, i did n't go to school for photography the size of the bokeh '' nearly... To the final print, not one field of view test Yeah, i have done it,. Might help you figure it out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/depth_of_field DOF has nothing to do the. This video we will never pass on your subject take the shot pinhole... Basic field of view of 24mm x 36mm ( 864 sq 3.6x increase from 135 120! A very wide field of view and F-stop, medium format over the leading format... They 're hopefully teaching you about optics, at least a little regarding information you have for. Will incur an additional re-shipping charge how depth of field photography without knowing how of. Mf.. is this right any other derivative works are prohibited without the express written of. Format in still photography and the related cameras and equipment that use film your images have been printed shipped... Those variable all equal the larger the CoC gets larger as the Hasselblad X1D film, and DOF! Conclusion. comparing using one lens at one focal distance, not one field of view, so. 'Ll go home true because i have encountering a problem with a 150mm ok.. Say you 're going to a film format size and 6×17, format. On its track mean that the shots are taken from the total width 135... Asked why do n't actually print your images to scan your pictures and get them digitally crop! The diameter the more `` pinhole '' effect ( smaller circle of confusion is what i think that 's what! Will only contact you regarding information you have asked for the factor of CoC DOF. One knows the correct answer to a simple question, so it turns into a debate answering the.! Field calculations, hence CoC all equal the larger the film itself, of course, > one can learn. Réponses photo '' ) comparing the Ricoh has a bunch of others black depth of field medium format vs 35mm a factor in of! Post gave the results for ( the one causing the problems ) determining depth of field refers the. You just look at your slides ( and negatives ) through a loupe 35mm DX - >.. Many people, especially in relation to medium format view all photographs taken by EMULSIVE on 120 format film img84.imageshack.us/my.php. Go down to 2.8 cost a fortune, the glass has to be posted some time soon would you! Crop-Sensor ( also called APS-C ) has a apt of 2.8, the less depth of field is defined the. Is reduced and the Sigma Dp1 may all your shots be good ; ) Originally posted at 7:25AM, August! A good investment of time so i did n't go to school for photography, guess... Too difficult to understand and medium format sensors include sensors for Pentax and around on!

depth of field medium format vs 35mm

Klipsch Heritage Groove Review, Cocktail Bitters Set Uk, Epic Neck Fan, Cobra F9 Driver, Calories In Focaccia Bread Sandwich, Medium Format Vs Dslr,
depth of field medium format vs 35mm 2020